Medscape FREE App available on 
iPhone, iPad, Android, & BlackBerry
-Search our Drug & Disease Reference iPhone, iPad, Android, & BlackBerry
-Read Daily Medical News
-Complete CME Activities
Download Now
                            Porto, Portugal - Researchers report that  many patients are diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) when in fact  they may have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid  syndrome (APS). In a review article published in the April 2005 issue of  Rheumatology, investigators say that this lapse could have an important effect on quality of life and mortality [                              1                          ]. "As seems evident from the literature  and from the everyday practice of those working with APS and SLE, a  significant number of these patients are probably mislabeled as MS,"  comment the researchers, led by Dr Susana Ferreira (S Joao  Hospital, Porto, Portugal). "Transverse myelitis and multifocal  white-matter lesions seem to be the most common confounding factors."
|   |   | 
|   | |
| Dr Susana Ferreira | |
|   | 
Ferreira and colleagues note that MS, SLE, and APS are  chronic, immune-mediated, relapsing-remitting disorders affecting young  adults--often women of childbearing age. Black and Japanese populations  are rarely affected by MS, but, the researchers say, they have one of  the highest incidences of SLE. The investigators point out that the  pathogenesis of all 3 disorders remains largely unknown, and since  neurological manifestations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be  indistinguishable, there are no specific diagnostic tools. Yet, the team  argues, the treatment and prognosis for these 3 disorders are quite  different. They write, "A significant number of patients with APS and  SLE are misdiagnosed as MS, but evidence suggests they are distinct  nosological entities. It is essential to differentiate them, since APS  may be responsive to anticoagulation."
                         When assessing MS, consider APS and SLE--especially if MS has atypical features                     
Ferreira and her group describe MS as the most common  cause of neurological disability in young adults. They note that the  course and prognosis are variable and there is no definitive long-term  treatment. They estimate that about 50% of patients will need help with  walking 15 years after diagnosis and 70% will have secondary progression  despite treatment. The researchers explain that there is controversy  about the prevalence and significance of antiphospholipid antibodies  (aPL) in MS. "When assessing MS patients, clinicians should consider APS  and SLE, especially if the MS has atypical features. A trial of  anticoagulation might be worthwhile in some patients with atypical MS  and consistently positive aPL."
                         A significant number of  patients with APS and SLE are misdiagnosed as MS, but evidence suggests  they are distinct nosological entities. It is essential to  differentiate them, since APS may be responsive to anticoagulation.                     
The investigators describe SLE as a multisystem disease,  where central nervous system involvement occurs in about 50% of  patients and carries a poor prognosis. They note that a wide spectrum of  neurological and psychiatric features is recognized. The researchers  add that demyelinating syndromes resembling MS such as lupoid sclerosis  are a rare feature of SLE and are a diagnostic challenge. They point out  that the pathophysiology of central nervous system lupus remains poorly  understood, but there is increasing evidence that it is often  associated with aPL and only rarely caused by vasculitis. They write,  "This is particularly true for myelopathy." Combined therapy with  immunosuppression and anticoagulation is often required. Recent studies  have also shown a reduction in mortality in SLE. The researchers  hypothesize that this is due to earlier recognition and treatment.
Ferreira and colleagues explain that APS is  characterized by thrombosis (venous or arterial) or pregnancy morbidity  in the presence of persistent aPL. They note that although only stroke  and transient ischemic attack are included in the classification  criteria, more complex neurological manifestations are being recognized,  and multifocal white-matter lesions on brain MRI are common. The  researchers say that APS can occur on its own (primary APS; 53%) or in  association with other diseases (secondary APS)--most commonly SLE  (36%).
                         Consistently positive aPL might suggest a different treatment approach                     
The investigators argue that despite discordance in the  literature, because APS is a treatable disease and aPL screening is a  noninvasive, widely available, and inexpensive diagnostic test, it seems  reasonable to consider it in patients with MS--particularly in those  with atypical features. They write, "Repeated negative results make a  diagnosis of APS unlikely. Consistently positive aPL might suggest a  different treatment approach." Ferreira and her team point out that  primary APS is being increasingly recognized and treated, and even  healthy individuals with aPL are now regarded as a population at risk.  "Treatment definitely improves prognosis," comment the researchers.
They suggest that when dealing with patients with MS or  MS-like illnesses, APS and SLE should be considered in the differential  diagnosis. They call for a careful medical history looking for  manifestations of APS or connective-tissue diseases such as previous  thrombosis, recurrent miscarriages, livedo reticularis,  thrombocytopenia, Raynaud's phenomenon, photosensitivity, rash,  arthralgias, and sicca syndrome.
Ferreira and colleagues argue that antiphospholipid  antibodies such as aCL, IgM and IgG should be considered. They note that  in some patients, an accurate diagnosis may emerge only after long-term  follow-up. If there is persistent aPL positivity or there are features  suggesting primary or secondary APS, the researchers recommend that a  trial of oral anticoagulation with a target international normalized  ratio (INR) of 3 to 4 for 6 months be considered with careful patient  counseling of the risks.

 
No comments:
Post a Comment